<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>www.erlewein.net &#187; ISTQB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erlewein.net/tag/istqb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erlewein.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:27:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ITCP Certification&#8230; Really? Honestly?</title>
		<link>http://www.erlewein.net/2009/itcp-certification-really-necessary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.erlewein.net/2009/itcp-certification-really-necessary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Erlewein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISTQB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erlewein.net/?p=713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do we need another certification body? ITCP (www.itcp.co.nz) is doing a concerted effort at a holistic NZ IT certification. Somehow that really is starting to bug me. Do we need all these people telling us we can do something and charging a substantial fee for it? It costs about $370 to get a certification and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we need another certification body? ITCP (<strong><a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfnyy25">www.itcp.co.nz</a></strong>) is doing a concerted effort at a holistic NZ IT certification. Somehow that really is starting to bug me. Do we need all these people telling us we can do something and charging a substantial fee for it?</p>
<p>It costs about $370 to get a certification and another $125 every year plus a 3-yearly retest at $170 to remain certified. That is $1165 for 5 years or $2130 for 10 years. And that&#8217;s only certification. No courses to train and no materials.  Just imagine spending that money  on books! I think they&#8217;d teach you a bit more than the cert ever can. You can even specialise on your topic and not be over generalised.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve read those books &amp; invested the time to understand them you can&#8217;t tell me an employer won&#8217;t take you. By that time you should be a real expert in your field. Nobody will have charged for a piece of (unbound)paper and the know-how gain is all your doing. It gives you an immense sense of accomplishment. You&#8217;ll still go to training courses and conferences advancing your know-how. If that is not what you&#8217;re doing already I&#8217;d guess you shouldn&#8217;t consider yourself an interested expert in your field anyway.</p>
<p>I do agree that it is difficult for companies to recognise a good employee/candidate. It takes proper screening and good interviews with intelligent questions. The certification organisations  try and convince you that their cert gives you the assurance of quality and standardisation. Well&#8230;.do they compensate for losses if that is not the case? If not, what is the use? Have I checked that the certification complies with the standards of my company? If not, are my standards wrong? Will that person then fit my company?</p>
<p>I think certifications (I do exclude product related certs here!!)  are  just an easy way out for companies employing people. They think if the cert&#8217;s there they can go and blindly employ. Of-course it is ideal for recruitment agencies and managers. You can rest assured that you&#8217;re promoting someone good &#8211; yeah right! So employing is: Person is alive &#8211; tick, has a CV &#8211; tick, can spell IT &#8211; tick and has the right certs &#8211; tick. Done. An employer that does that will only get my services if I&#8217;m really desperate (and even then I&#8217;d rather not). For all involved parties it is good to remember that employment is a two-way road. The candidate chooses the company as much as the company does the candidate.</p>
<p>I like to be challenged and prodded in an employment process. No cert is ever going to save me from curve-balls in real employment meetings. Only my know-how and education will (and education can be obtained by several means not only the institutionalised way. See <strong><a href="http://www.buccaneerscholar.com/">www.buccaneerscholar.com</a></strong> for more detail). What an employer is/should really be looking for is engagement and interest. Without those you have a working drone (which sometimes could be what you really want but most of the time not). Where is the cert qualifying engagement and interest?</p>
<p>When I have people apply for a job that have an ISTQB certification for example, there are two groups that  I can discern:</p>
<ol>
<li>Those that have been dragged there by their companies (and have never thought about what they are doing)</li>
<li>Those that aren&#8217;t good testers and need something that will give them a foothold</li>
</ol>
<p>I have yet to meet someone who has taken the exam that admits to stand behind the ISTQB certification. I am guessing the same thing will happen to ITCP. Certs in my opinion are actually a qualifier for mediocre abilities and/or a disinterest in my profession. If I&#8217;m good then a certification is an insult to my abilities. If I&#8217;m not a cert won&#8217;t help me to become better it will just show that I&#8217;m as good as any other of the thousand cert-Joe&#8217;s out there. I&#8217;d be better advised to do something spectacular, amazing and outright creative with my time. No matter what it is as long as it has some relevance to my job and I can speak to it. It will get you the job.</p>
<p>So why do these organisations not make a course with an exam and stop calling it a certification? Then everybody who thinks this course is a good idea can take it  and those that don&#8217;t can stay away without getting a stigmata? By pushing it as a certification and even going down the path of trying to make it mandatory it just plainly looks like an IT-Tax&#8230;. I wanna work in IT so I have to pay $$$ and we&#8217;ll do an examisomething so that it has a hint of legality &#8211; yeah right!</p>
<p>Maybe someday someone will change my mind but I doubt I&#8217;ll ever warm up to certification. Remains the hope I won&#8217;t be run out of town anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erlewein.net/2009/itcp-certification-really-necessary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
