<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>www.erlewein.net &#187; AMD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.erlewein.net/tag/amd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.erlewein.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 03:46:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Coming Back from the Dead &#8230;.Again</title>
		<link>http://www.erlewein.net/2008/amd-coming-back-from-the-dead-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.erlewein.net/2008/amd-coming-back-from-the-dead-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Erlewein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.erlewein.de/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD has been around as Intel&#8217;s thorn for quite a while now. Every now and again Intel leapfrogs and AMD gets caught out cold. This has again happened in the past 1-2 chip generations costing AMD market share and $$$. I always feel for AMD when that happens. They do a lot of good stuff [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.erlewein.de/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/quadcore_opteron.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-331" title="quadcore_opteron" src="http://www.erlewein.de/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/quadcore_opteron.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="90" /></a><a href="http://www.amd.com"><strong>AMD</strong></a> has been around as Intel&#8217;s thorn for quite a while now. Every now and again Intel leapfrogs and AMD gets caught out cold. This has again happened in the past 1-2 chip generations costing AMD market share and $$$. I always feel for AMD when that happens. They do a lot of good stuff and without AMD we&#8217;d surely not be where we are today. They create a minimum of competition with Intel.</p>
<p>AMD has introduced their new 45nm Opteron CPUs called Shanghai. Let&#8217;s hope it turns out to be the success they need to get back in the game. From a technological point of view the numbers look very good. The energy efficiency (compared to Xeons) is very good. Looking at the server two processor + VMware market that becomes very interesting. I know I&#8217;d love one to run all our VM stuff on at work.</p>
<p>Maybe now even Apple will get interested. They already chose Nvidia over Intel&#8230;.</p>
<p>Read more here: <a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2008/11/amd_bails_out_i_1.html"><strong>http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2008/11/amd_bails_out_i_1.html</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.erlewein.net/2008/amd-coming-back-from-the-dead-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
